Resources
Our lab guide, plus funding, writing, and data resources for the lab and the broader community.
Lab Guide & Expectations
Every member of the PIE Lab signs a mentoring agreement when they join. Each item pairs an expectation of the mentee with a matching commitment from Dr. Pierrat as mentor, and the whole agreement is revisited during an annual review so the mentoring relationship keeps working for everyone. All lab members are expected to abide by UCSB academic integrity policies and the ethical standards of our professional societies (e.g., AGU) and funding agencies (e.g., NASA, NSF), and Dr. Pierrat commits to the same university, society, and funding codes of conduct. Below you will find a summary of the shared guide, career-stage research expectations, and full role-specific mentoring agreements linked at the end.
Group Purpose Statement and Lab values
The Photon Informed Ecology (PIE) Lab leverages remote sensing to understand plants’ role in the carbon and water cycles, linking observed remote sensing metrics to their physical and biological drivers from the leaf to the globe. This work helps quantify carbon and water fluxes, understand environmental stresses on terrestrial ecosystems, and plan for a changing climate.
We strive to cultivate a diverse, equitable, and inclusive collaborative space. In practice that means we:
- share agendas ahead of time and invite regular feedback on how the group operates;
- listen to everyone invited to the table;
- object when a decision would negatively affect the work, and let it go when it is merely a preference;
- make strategic decisions as a group while respecting the operational roles of individuals.
Treat all group members, UCSB faculty and staff, and scientific colleagues with respect and curiosity. Diverse perspectives and experiences are valuable to the progress of science; you will not always agree with someone, but you can always treat them with dignity. Participate as an engaged lab citizen — show up for group meetings and social events and help others with your expertise. Dr. Pierrat commits to weekly group meetings and an annual lab social and will work to foster an environment that recognizes everyone’s contributions.
Communication
Meetings
- Arrive on time, or give advance notice if you are running late.
- Come to weekly meetings with a plan for what you want to discuss; a running project-notes document keeps everyone aligned on progress and next steps.
- Dr. Pierrat commits to a minimum of 30 minutes individually and one hour in the larger group each week, adjusted as needed.
Slack & email
- Join the group Slack and use it for short or urgent communications; use email for longer ones or things with a specific deadline.
- Expect — and provide — a Slack reply within about 24 hours and an email reply within about 48 hours during normal working hours. Replies are not expected in the evenings, on weekends, or during scheduled vacation.
Feedback on written work
- When you ask for feedback, give a specific date you would like it by (at least two weeks out) and note how firm that deadline is.
- Dr. Pierrat and coauthors commit to giving detailed feedback on all written work — abstracts, prospectuses, papers, proposals, posters, and presentations — typically within two weeks for papers and proposals.
Shared resources & funds
Lab space & equipment
- Lab facilities, tools, and instruments are shared group resources. Keep your workspace organized and return equipment to its proper place.
- Tell Dr. Pierrat as soon as possible if something is broken, lost, damaged, or needs maintenance.
Funds & purchases
- Group funds are a shared resource. Keep meal and lodging costs reasonable while traveling and run most purchases by Dr. Pierrat for approval.
- Communicate research-support needs early — a computer, more storage, a field tool, a monitor. Funding cannot always be guaranteed, but unstated needs cannot be met.
- Dr. Pierrat commits to communicating funding availability clearly, working continuously to secure funding, and prioritizing student and postdoc travel when possible.
Curated resources
- Funding, writing, data, and coding links live in the sections below on this page (Pivot, NSF GRFP, NASA early-career programs, Writing Science, Openscapes, NASA EarthData, and more).
Work schedule & time off
Hours
- There is no expectation of work outside typical hours (roughly 9–5, Monday to Friday) or during UCSB holidays.
- Gauge when you are most productive within a 40-hour week; some weeks will run heavier or lighter around deadlines and milestones.
Vacation
- Take time off when you need it. Time off around the holidays and in the summer is entirely reasonable.
- Provide advance notice (at least two weeks) for any trip longer than a long weekend (except for emergencies). Dr. Pierrat will support reasonable time off and take it too.
Planning & review
- Prepare an annual personal plan with short-, medium-, and long-term goals and major milestones, reviewed together at the start of the year, with a self-evaluation at year’s end.
- If the mentoring is not working for you, raise it. Feedback runs both directions during the annual review, and Dr. Pierrat will adjust her approach.
Role-specific research expectations
The professional expectations above apply to everyone. Research expectations scale with career stage:
Undergraduate
- Engage in genuine scientific inquiry, not just assigned analysis tasks.
- Invest a minimum of four hours per week in your project.
- Publication is not expected, though some projects reach that level; you may also contribute to graduate or postdoc papers.
- Present at UCSB undergraduate research symposia, with a practice talk beforehand. Conference travel funding is limited, so raise opportunities early.
Graduate student
- Become the world expert in the narrow sub-field of your dissertation.
- The PhD target is three first-author papers, published or submitted by the time you defend.
- Primarily invest your time in PIE lab projects; outside collaborations are supported once your funded work is on track and discussed in weekly meetings.
- Present at conferences (typically AGU Fall) with a practice talk one to two weeks ahead; apply for supplementary travel funding where applicable.
Postdoctoral scholar
- Establish yourself as an independent scholar with lighter scientific oversight than a PhD student.
- Aim for at least one first-author publication per year.
- Primarily invest your time in PIE lab projects; outside collaborations are supported presuming your funded work is on track.
- Present at conferences with a practice talk beforehand. Applied or educational deliverables may fall outside traditional publishing, communicated in advance depending on specific career goals.
Publishing & authorship
- Aim for the same high-quality venues you cite — for example New Phytologist, JGR: Biogeosciences, Remote Sensing of Environment, Ecology, Global Change Biology, Water Resources Research, Geophysical Research Letters, and AGU Advances although this list is non-exhaustive. Journal selection should be guided by the relevance and impact of the work and discussed prior to submission.
- Coauthorship is earned through a substantive intellectual contribution — study design, analysis or visualization that adds insight, shared code that changes the message, original figures or text, or detailed constructive feedback beyond light edits.
- Credit group members and collaborators for substantive input, and raise any concerns about credit or overlapping projects early — these are easiest to resolve at the start of a project.
Full agreements
Curated Resources
Funding, writing, data, and community-building resources for the lab and the broader community. Select a category to expand it.
Funding
General
Pivot — a searchable database of funding opportunities.
NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP)
Program page · Application resources
NASA Early Career Research
Overviews of NASA funding for undergraduate (SARP and FIES2A), graduate (FINESST), and postdoc/faculty (ECIP-ES) researchers.
Program page
Writing
Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded by Joshua Schimel (UCSB Professor!) — this book changed my life and I cannot recommend it more highly. Email me for a PDF version, or buy it here.
The unwritten rules of graduate school (Pensky et al., 2021)
General Scientific, Data & Coding
- UCSB Data Science
- Openscapes
- NASA EarthData
- GitHub Strategies from Openscapes — openscapes.github.io/series/core-lessons/github
- NASA Earthdata Cloud Cookbook from Openscapes — nasa-openscapes.github.io/earthdata-cloud-cookbook
Community & Collaboration
Governance
- Rau, T. (2021). Who Decides Who Decides: How to Start a Group So Everyone Can Have a Voice! sociocracyforall.org/who-decides-who-decides
- Dana, C., Hornbein, D., Russell, V., & Schneider, N. (2021). Community Rules: Simple Templates for Great Communities. Booklet & citation · communityrule.info
Hosting One-Off Events
- Parker, P. (2018). The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters. priyaparker.com/book-art-of-gathering
- 500 Women Scientists. Guide to Organizing Inclusive Science Meetings (v1.2). 500womenscientists.org/inclusive-scientific-meetings
Meeting Structures
- McCandless, K., & Lipmanowicz, H. (2014). The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures: Simple Rules to Unleash a Culture of Innovation. Bookstore · liberatingstructures.com
Facilitation and Conflict
- Rosenberg, M. B. (2015). Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life — Life-Changing Tools for Healthy Relationships. bookshop.org
- NOAA Office for Coastal Management (2018). Dealing with Disruptive Behaviors, from the Planning and Facilitation Collaborative Meeting Training.
Collaborative Tools Example Guides
- NMFS Open Science GitHub Working Group (2025). GitHub and Git — Guidance and Best Practices for NMFS Users (v3.8). nmfs-opensci.github.io/GitHub-Guide — GitHub use guide for NOAA Fisheries
Continued Community Building
- Bacon, J. (2009). The Art of Community. jonobacon.com/books/artofcommunity — building free and open source community
- Woodley & Pratt (2020). The CSCCE Community Participation Model — A framework for member engagement and information flow in STEM communities. Center for Scientific Collaboration and Community Engagement. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3997802 · cscce.org/resources/cpm
How to Science
- Olson, D., Meyerson, J., Parsons, M., Castro, J., Lassere, M., Wright, D., … & Acker, A. (2019). Information Maintenance as a Practice of Care. The Information Maintainers. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3236409 — the ethics of going slow and fixing things in informatics
- Akerlof, K. L., Timm, K. M. F., Chase, A., Cloyd, E. T., Heath, E., McGhghy, B. A., et al. (2023). What does equitable co-production entail? Three perspectives. Community Science, 2, e2022CSJ000021. doi.org/10.1029/2022CSJ000021 — how to define co-production
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Jochen Stutz, Kerry Cawse-Nicholson, Christian Frankenberg, Kathe Todd-Brown, and Jen Diehl for providing resources and ideas that formed this guide.